Williamson v. Hardwick

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals

Decided Oct. 19, 1955.

Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-10-19

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently June 1964

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on Williamson v. Hardwick

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-10-19

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Charles O. Williamson, in pro. per.

¶2James W. Dorsey, U. S. Atty., Harvey H. Tisinger, Asst. U. S. Atty., Atlanta', Ga., for appellee.

¶3Before HUTCHESON, Chief Judge, and BORAH and CAMERON, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The proceeding out of which this appeal grows was commenced by a petition of habeas corpus, the basis of which was that the action of the United States Board of Parole in first paroling him and later revoking the parole was illegal. The district judge in dismissing the petition correctly stated the facts and applied the controlling law thereto. For the reasons and upon the authorities stated by the district judge, 135 F.Supp. 463, the judgment appealed from is affirmed.