Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 F.2d 313 - Kampmeyer v. United States

Kampmeyer v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

227 F.2d 313 · 1955

Citation profile

34
cited by 34 later decisions
March 1986
most recently cited

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 34 later decisions — most recently March 1986 · most notably Koolish v. United States (1965), United States of America, Plaintiff-Respondent v. Raymond A. O'COnnOr (1956)

29 federal appellate · 1 district ·

1601955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 26 U.S.C. § 145

Relies on Holland v. United States · United States v. Johnson · Hem v. United States · Goldbaum v. United States · Rossi v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 34 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “so completely erroneous as to result in a miscarriage of justice,”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “"At best it was, of course, but an estimate, but as an estimate it was ■entitled to the consideration of the jury because based on substantially the entire evidence in the record. United States v. Johnson, 319 U.S. 503 , 519, 63 S.Ct. 1233 , 87 L.Ed. 1546 ; Bell v. United States, 4 Cir., 185 F.2d 302 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Once the Government has established its case, the defendant remains quiet at his peril. Cf. Yee Hem v. United States, 268 U.S. 178 , 185, 45 S.Ct. 470 , 472, 69 L.Ed. 904 . The practical disadvantages to the taxpayer are lessened by the pressures on the Government to check and negate relevant leads.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.