Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 F.2d 568 - Davis v. United States

Davis v. United States’s Empirical Analysis

227 F.2d 568 · 1955

Citation profile

23
cited by 23 later decisions
February 2004
most recently cited

20 federal appellate ·

How this case has been cited

Cited by 23 later decisions — most recently February 2004

20 federal appellate ·

90195519601970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Quercia v. United States · Patton v. United States · United States v. Murdock · Horning v. District of Columbia · Minner v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 23 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““I feel obligated to say to you that under this evidence, I am of the opinion, beyond a reasonable doubt, that the defendant did commit the act as charged, and I say that so that in the event you come to the same conclusion, you will know that I am of the same opinion, * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““Rather the court was content to make a statement laying emphasis upon the heinousness of the offense charged and to express an opinion that the evidence convinced him of the guilt of the defendant beyond a reasonable doubt.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““His assurance to the jury that it was the sole judge of the facts and should acquit the defendant if not convinced of his guilt beyond a reasonable doubt did not repair the damage done.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.