Olesen v. Stanard’s Empirical Analysis
227 F.2d 785 · 1955
Citation profile
9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
cited 1 times by the Supreme Court
March 1966
most recently cited
6 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1001
Relies on Cates v. Haderlein · Door v. Donaldson · Williams v. Petty · 136 F. Supp. 751 - Barel v. Fiske
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““At the administrative hearing, appellee’s advertising circulars were received in evidence, but none of the wares referred to therein was offered and no evidence was adduced to the effect that any of the advertised wares had been mailed or transported in any manner. And there was no evidence, descriptive or otherwise, that the wares which might be sent to one who ordered them through the circulars, would, in fact, be in violation of the statute.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.