Challenger, Inc. v. Durno’s Empirical Analysis
227 F.2d 918 · 1955
Citation profile
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently April 1990
16 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on McAllister v. United States · In Re Disbarment of Isserman · Bolles Wooden Ware Co v. United States · Pine River Logging Improvement Company v. United States · C. J. Dick Towing Co. v. The Leo
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“does not avail himself of the existing contractual right to a private foreclosure . . . cannot continue to hold the vessel indefinitely awaiting . . . an admiralty foreclosure . . .”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“Accordingly the decree is modified, with interest on the reduced amount, Appellant to recover costs of the appeal; otherwise affirmed.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“is comparable to a charterer pro hac vice who can acquire no maritime lien in his own behalf.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.