In Re: Celotex Corp’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently January 2025 · most notably Sikes v. Teleline, Inc. (2002), United States v. Jordan (2003)
7 federal appellate · 1 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Johnson v. Georgia Highway Express, Inc. · 785 F.2d 1249 · Grant v. George Schumann Tire & Battery Co. · Hall Financial Group, Inc. v. DP Partners, Ltd. Partnership · Lebron
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In determining the amount of reasonable compensation to be awarded to an examiner, trustee under chapter 11, or professional person, the court shall consider the nature, the extent, and the value of such services, taking into account all relevant factors, including- (A) the time spent on such services; (B) the rates charge for such services; (C) whether services were necessary to the administration of, or beneficial at the time at which the services were rendered toward the completion of, a case under this title; (D) whether the services were performed within a reasonable amount of time commensurate with the complexity, importance, and nature of the problem, issue, or task addressed; (E) with respect to a professional person, whether the person is board certified or otherwise has demonstrated skill and experience in the bankruptcy field; and (F) whether the compensation is reasonable based on the customary compensation charged by comparable skilled practitioners in cases other than cases under this title.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[e]xamining a creditor's intent unnecessarily complicates the analysis of whether a contribution of considerable value or worth has been made.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“11 U.S.C. § 503 . Allowance of administrative expenses (b) After notice and a hearing, there shall be allowed administrative expenses, other than claims allowed under section 502(f) of this title, including— (3) the actual, necessary expenses, other than compensation and reimbursement specified in paragraph (4) of this subsection, incurred by— (D) a creditor, an indenture trustee, an equity security holder, or a committee representing creditors or equity security holders other than a committee appointed under section 1102 of this title, in making a substantial contribu tion in a case under chapter 9 or 11 of this title.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.