Mj v. Mj’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
23 district ·
How this case has been cited
Cited by 83 later decisions — most recently June 2023 · most notably III III v. Jc & Jc, Dsc Ltd v. Dsc
23 district ·
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Pioneer Investment Services Company v. Brunswick Associates Limited Partnership · Hutchinson v. Otis · Rembert v. AT & T Universal Card Services, Inc. · Groves v. Ring Screw Works · Sambo's Restaurants, Inc. v. Wheeler
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 83 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The question is not how the reviewing court would have ruled, but rather whether a reasonable person could agree with the bankruptcy court's decision; if reasonable persons could differ as to the issue, then there is no abuse of discretion.”
5 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“review[s] the bankruptcy court's decision rather than the district court's review of the bankruptcy court's decision.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“definite and firm conviction that the [court below] committed a clear error of judgment.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.