Cigna v. T’s Empirical Analysis
Citation profile
3 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 2021
3 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Richardson v. Perales · Diaz v. Chater · Bumble Bee Seafoods v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs · New Orleans Stevedores v. Turner · Stevens v. Director, Office of Workers' Compensation Programs
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[A] report simply matching general statements of [the claimant’s] job skills with general descriptions of jobs fitting those skills is not enough to show that suitable employment alternatives existed for [him].”). 6 . The examiner noted petitioner's testimony (a) “that he has previously requested consideration for employment with [Fed Ex] in at least two positions, one being a dispatcher type position in the employer’s 'key room,’ which, at least at that time, [petitioner] felt he could do”; but that (b)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.