Korsinsky v. Dudas’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1295 · 28 U.S.C. § 1338 · 35 U.S.C. § 41 · 5 U.S.C. § 706
Relies on Holmes Group, Inc. v. Vornado Air Circulation Systems, Inc. · Star Fruits Snc v. United States · University of West Virginia, Board of Trustees v. Vanvoorhies
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[the plaintiff] originally appealed to the United States Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit, but the case was transferred to this court because it arises under 28 U.S.C. 1338 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.