Bloch v. Powell’s Empirical Analysis
2002
Citation profile
69 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 3901 (Department of State Special Agents Retirement Act of 1998) · 22 U.S.C. § 3948 · 22 U.S.C. § 4007 · 22 U.S.C. § 4010 · 22 U.S.C. § 4047 · 22 U.S.C. § 4051 · 22 U.S.C. § 4052 · 22 U.S.C. § 4055
Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Board of Regents of State Colleges v. Roth · Motor Vehicle Manufacturers Association of United States Inc v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company Consumer Alert · United States v. Ron Pair Enterprises, Inc.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 78 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“arbitrary, capricious, an abuse of discretion, or otherwise not in accordance with law.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“[T]his case involves review of a final agency determination under the [APA]; therefore, resolution of th[e] matter does not require fact finding on behalf of this court. Rather, the court's review is limited to the administrative record.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority“[A]ccording due deference to the FSGB, this court determines that the FSGB's decision is not arbitrary or capricious and that the [Department] did not deny [Bloch]'s right to due process.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Bloch v. Powell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.