Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Ga. App. 5 - Howard v. State

227 Ga. App. 5 - Howard v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

38
cited by 38 later decisions
1
states following
June 2016
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 38 later decisions — most recently June 2016 · most notably 233 Ga. App. 244 - Kelley v. State (1998), 231 Ga. App. 329 - Reviere v. State (1998)

2 federal appellate · 36 state decisions

270199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 218 Ga. App. 637 - Grier v. State · Glass v. State · 223 Ga. App. 448 - Turner v. State · 213 Ga. App. 766 - Cornelius v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 38 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant ... no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence; moreover, an appellate court does not weigh the evidence or determine witness credibility but only determines whether the evidence is sufficient under the standard of Jackson v. Virginia. 3 . . . Conflicts in the testimony of witnesses, including the State’s witnesses, [are] a matter of credibility for the jury to resolve. As long as there is some competent evidence, even though contradicted, to support each fact necessary to make out the State’s case, the jury’s verdict will be upheld. 4”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.