Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Ga. App. 907 - James v. State

227 Ga. App. 907 - James v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1997

Citation profile

22
cited by 22 later decisions
2
states following
November 2013
most recently cited

22 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 22 later decisions — most recently November 2013

22 state decisions

180199720002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Jackson v. Virginia · 224 Ga. App. 52 - Woods v. State · 222 Ga. App. 397 - Carter v. State · 224 Ga. App. 190 - West v. State · 192 Ga. App. 260 - Groble v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “On appeal from a criminal conviction, the evidence must be construed in the light most favorable to the verdict, and the appellant no longer enjoys a presumption of innocence. An appellate court determines only the legal sufficiency of the evidence adduced below and does not weigh the evidence or assess the credibility of the witnesses. To sustain the conviction, the evidence must be sufficient to authorize the jury’s finding of the defendant’s guilt of the crime charged beyond a reasonable doubt. 2”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a] person is a party to a crime if he intentionally aids or abets in the commission of the crime. While mere presence at the scene of the commission of a crime is not sufficient evidence to convict one of being a party thereto, presence, companionship, and conduct before and after the offense are circumstances from which one’s participation in the criminal intent may be inferred.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.