Seip v. Gray’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 18 later decisions — most recently March 2008
14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Robertson v. Smith · First National Bank v. Ransford · Armacost v. Lindley · Alexander v. Swackhamer · Bennett v. Preston
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 18 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““ ‘The essence of every conversion is the wrongful invasion of the right to, and absolute dominion over, property owned, or controlled, by the person deprived thereof, or of its use and benefit.’ First National Bank v. Ransford (1913), 55 Ind. App. 663, 666 , 104 N.E. 604 ; Kidder v. Biddle (1895), 13 Ind. App. 653, 659 , 42 N.E. 293 ; Vandalia R. Co. v. Upson Nut Co. (1913), 55 Ind. App. 252, 254 , 101 N.E. 114 , 101 N.E. 38 8; Chicago I. & L. R. R. Co. v. Pope (1934), 99 Ind. App. 280, 282 , 188 N.E. 594 .””
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.