Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Ind. 701 - Gilley v. State

Gilley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

44
cited by 44 later decisions
3
states following
January 2010
most recently cited

44 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 44 later decisions — most recently January 2010 · most notably Goodpaster v. State (1980), Finch v. State (1967)

44 state decisions

24019491950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on McKee v. Mutual Life Ins. Co. of New York · Brown v. State · McAdams v. State · Marshall v. State · Pease v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 44 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[tlhe rule is that unexplained, exelusive possession of recently stolen property constitutes a cireumstance from which a court or jury may draw an inference of guilt”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““. . . The circumstance was sufficient to permit the trial court to draw an inference of guilt and convict the appellants. . . .””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. ““Of course an affidavit must be filed in order to invoke the jurisdiction of the court, and was filed in this case', wherein this case differs from Pease v. State (1921), 74 Ind. App. 572 , 129 N. E. 337 , upon which appellants here lay great stress, and wherein it is stated in the body of the opinion no affidavit was filed. It was merely an unverified complaint.” 227 Ind. at 708 .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.