Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Ky. 153 - Johnson v. Commonwealth

Johnson v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1928

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
1
states following
June 1954
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently June 1954

7 state decisions

401928193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loving v. Commonwealth · Commonwealth v. Chesapeake & Ohio R'y Co. · Couch v. Commonwealth · Garten v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““True, section 596 of the Civil Code authorizes ‘the party producing a witness’ to ‘contradict him by other evidence, and by showing that he has made statements different from his present testimony.’ But this rule has been restricted to cases in which the evidence of the witness is prejudicial to the party producing him and has never been applied to cases in which the witness merely fails to prove what is expected of him and says nothing to prejudice the party’s case.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.