Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 La. 282 - State v. Dore

State v. Dore’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
1
states following
May 1989
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently May 1989

14 state decisions

801955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on State v. Borde · State v. Anderson · State v. Fletcher · Bolton v. Rouss · State v. Menard

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““It is elementary that the evidence in a criminal case must correspond with the allegations of the indictment which are essential and material to charge the offense in order that the requirement may be fulfilled that an accused shall be definitely informed as to the charges against him, and that he may be protected against another-prosecution for the same offense. See 27 Am. Jur., Verbo Indictments and Informations, Sec. 177, pp. 722-723; State v. Braxton, 47 La.Ann. 158 , 16 So. 745 ; State v. Anderson, 136 La. 261 , 66 So. 966 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.