Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 LA 478 - Pitre v. Peltier

Pitre v. Peltier’s Empirical Analysis

1955

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
March 1986
most recently cited

9 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently March 1986

9 state decisions

601955196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Fried v. Bradley · Whitney Nat. Bank of New Orleans v. Schwob

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Under the jurisprudence of this State the applicability of these two articles [2221 and 3542] has been restricted to those nullities that are not in derogation of public order and good morals. In considering them this Court has differentiated between nullities of that type and those established in the interest of individuals, and has narrowed the applicability of the articles to the latter class of nullities.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Thus it may be seen that the lawmakers in their wisdom have deemed it to the interest of society to interpose a statute of repose by fixing a time limit (10 years), after which the parties at interest, by their silence and inaction, are conclusively presumed to have acquiesced in and ratified the act, and to have renounced such right as they may have had to attack it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(t)he plea of prescription of ten years liberandi causa is therefore maintained as to those plaintiffs who admit their respective signatures or mark to the instruments which were allegedly procured through fraud or deception.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.