Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Md. 41 - Childress v. State

Childress v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1961

Citation profile

15
cited by 15 later decisions
1
states following
January 2007
most recently cited

15 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 15 later decisions — most recently January 2007

15 state decisions

5019611970198019902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Cornish v. State · Wanzer v. State · Price v. State · Gattus v. State · State v. Marshall

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 15 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “The arrest occurred when the first officer laid his hand on the appellant’s shoulder and told him he was under arrest. Cornish v. State, 215 Md. 64 , 137 A.2d 170 ; Price v. State, 227 Md. 28 , 175 A.2d 11 . The arrest was for a misdemeanor committed in the presence of a police officer, and was proper on that score. See cases cited on that point in the Price case and Kauffman, The Law of Arrest in Maryland, 5 Md. L.Rev. 125, rule 6, p. 160. The arrest was made almost at once and was therefore made in due time. See 1 Bishop, New Criminal Procedure (Underhill, 2 ed., 1913), § 183(6); 4 Wharton, Criminal Procedure (Anderson ed., 1957); § 1615; 4 Am.Jur., Arrest, § 67; Annotation, 58 A.L.R.2d 1056 ; A.L.I. Code of Criminal Procedure, § 21(a) and comment thereon (at p. 234). Cf. Gattus v. State, 204 Md. 589, 699-601 , 105 A.2d 661 , where this rule was recognized but found inapplicable.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.