Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

227 N.C. 70

40 S.E.2d 460

State v. . Blair

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 11, 1946

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1946-12-11

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently November 1967

4 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1946-12-11

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1 The embezzlement statute creates an offense unknown at common law. It applies only to the classes of persons therein naméd. *71 S. v. Whitehurst, 212 N. C., 300, 193 S. E., 657; S. v. Eurell, 220 N. C., 519, 17 S. E. (2d), 669. It does not embrace a vendor in an executory contract of purchase and sale. Hence the court below erred in denying the defendant’s motion to dismiss as in case of nonsuit.

¶2 The defendant did not appeal from the judgment pronounced in the ease (4430) consolidated and tried with this indictment.' Hence, said judgment is not affected by this opinion.

¶3 The judgment below (4477) is

¶4 Eeversed.

/227/nc/70 · .json · Public domain