Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Neb. 545 - State v. Eichelberger

State v. Eichelberger’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
2
states following
January 2017
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently January 2017 · most notably State v. Ryan (1989), State v. Green (1991)

31 state decisions

1601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Padilla · Otey v. Nebraska · State v. Lynch · State v. Schott · State v. Lee

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[I]n determining the sufficiency of the evidence to sustain a criminal conviction, it is not the province of this court to resolve conflicts in the evidence, pass on the credibility of witnesses, determine the plausibility of explanations, or weigh the evidence. Such matters are for the finder of fact. The verdict must be sustained if, taking the view most favorable to the State, there is sufficient evidence to support it.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “Exercise of the right to assistance of counsel is subject to the necessities of sound judicial administration. Criminal defendants are not permitted to use their constitutional right to counsel to manipulate ... or to interfere with the fair administration of justice.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.