Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 N.J. Super. 51 - State v. Adams

227 N.J. Super. 51 - State v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis

1988

Citation profile

9
cited by 9 later decisions
1
states following
April 2013
most recently cited

8 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2013

8 state decisions

601988199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Powell · Dunn v. United States · Bibby v. United States · Kelly v. Robinson · Balistrieri v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “We view the listed additional offenses and circumstances in N.J.S.A. 2C:14-2a(l) through (6) as enhancement features which raise the degree of the crime. They are enhancement features because each in its own way reflects a legislative recognition of an additional threat of physical or psychological harm to the victim, over and above the act of sexual violence. They thus authorize increased punishment because of the increased risk of harm to the victim when the sexual assault or attempted offense is committed in connection with any one or more of the specified other offenses, thus becoming "aggravated.” [ 227 N.J.Super. at 61 , 545 A.2d 798 .]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “`implicat[ed] a defendant's substantive constitutional rights'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.