Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 N.W.2d 121 - State v. Cullison

State v. Cullison’s Empirical Analysis

1975

Citation profile

106
cited by 106 later decisions
2
states following
July 2014
most recently cited

106 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 106 later decisions — most recently July 2014 · most notably State v. Conner (1976), State v. Aldape (1981)

106 state decisions

48019751980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Miranda v. State of Arizona Vignera · Schneckloth v. Bustamonte · Sheppard v. Maxwell · Lego v. Twomey · Blackburn v. Alabama

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 106 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[T]he issue of whether officers have exercised coercion so as to render statements involuntary [is determined] by examining the totality of the circumstances.... The “totality of the circumstances” encompasses the characteristics of the accused and the details of the interrogation process.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[W]e do not review fact findings of the lower tribunal further than to ascertain they are sustained by competent and substantial evidence.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “There is illegality within the meaning of the certiorari rule "when there is not substantial evidence to support the findings on which the inferior court or tribunal based its conclusions of law." ... [Citing authority].”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.