Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

227 N.Y. 593

125 N.E 925

Schieffelin v. . Hylan

New York Court of Appeals

Decided October 21, 1919

New York Court of Appeals · decided 1919-10-21

Appeal, by permission, from an order of the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, entered June 6,1919, which affirmed an order of Special Term granting a motion for the continuance of an injunction pendente lite in a taxpayer’s action. The following questions were certified; “ 1.

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1919-10-21

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently June 1969

4 state decisions

10191919201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1 Order affirmed, with costs. First question certified answered in negative. Third, fourth and seventh questions answered in affirmative. Fifth question answered in negative. The public service commission has made no sufficient requisition. Second and sixth questions not answered; no opinion.

¶2 Concur: Hiscock, Ch. J., Chase, Cardozo, Pound, McLaughlin and Andbews, JJ. Absent: Hogan, J.

/227/ny/593 · .json · Public domain