State v. Tauscher’s Empirical Analysis
1961
Citation profile
2 district · 14 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently June 2006
2 district · 14 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“"Any person who steals the property of another, or who wilfully takes, carries, leads or drives away the property of another with the intent to deprive such other of such property permanently, is guilty of larceny; * * *."”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stuart“It is unfortunate that ORS 165.005 and 164.310 are so narrowly drawn. However, the task of remodeling these statutes is for the legislature and not for the courts.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stuart“was apparently intended to mean only that the fundamental elements necessary to constitute larceny at common law are preserved by statute in Oregon.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Stuart
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.