¶1Among other contentions, defendant questions the sufficiency of the evidence to support his convictions for breaking and entering with intent to commit a felony and grand larceny.
¶2We have carefully reviewed the record and considered all of defendant’s arguments which we find to be devoid of merit.
¶3Affirmed on the authority of Williams v. State, Fla.App.1968, 206 So.2d 446.
¶4Affirmed.