227 So. 2d 728 - Mitchell v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1969
Citation profile
7
cited by 7 later decisions
3
states following
June 1976
most recently cited
1 federal appellate · 6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on Mapp v. Ohio · Schmerber v. State of California · Malloy v. Hogan · Wolf v. People of the State of Colorado · Breithaupt v. Abram
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We hold in the case sub judice that the blood-taking evidence was inadmissible when tested by the constitutional guar anties against compulsory self-incrimination and unreasonable searches and seizures, in light of the facts and circumstances under which the blood was forcibly taken.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“Mitchell did not consent to the blood taking, nor was he even asked.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Mitchell
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.