Warwick Corp. v. Turetsky’s Empirical Analysis
2017
Citation profile
Relationships
Relies on 760 So. 2d 126 - Volusia County v. Aberdeen at Ormond Beach · 698 So. 2d 618 - PURRELL v. State Farm Fire and Cas. Co. · 680 So. 2d 588 - Lambert v. Berkley South Condominium Ass'n · 573 So. 2d 885 - Tire Kingdom, Inc. v. First Southern Ins. Co. · Interline Brands, Inc. v. Chartis Specialty Insurance
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“100% of the individually stated value for each scheduled item of property insured at the location which had the loss as shown on the latest Statement of Values on file with this Company”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“the agents, brokers, and [insurer] all agreed the spreadsheet was a statement of values”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.