Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 SW2D 261 - Rawdon v. Garvie

Rawdon v. Garvie’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

5
cited by 5 later decisions
1
states following
December 1983
most recently cited

5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 5 later decisions — most recently December 1983

5 state decisions

201950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Loma Vista Development Co. v. Johnson · Clem v. Evans · Braxton v. Haney · Tripplehorn v. Ladd-Hannon Oil Corp. · Pool v. Joy

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““In a purchaser’s action against a vendor for breach of contract it must be alleged and shown that the contract and breach thereof were made with fraudulent intent on the part of the vendor not to perform. The burden rests upon the plaintiff or purchaser to allege and prove in such an action that the promise, when made, was fraudulent and made with the intention not to perform it. El Jardin Immigration Co. v. Karlan, Tex.Civ.App., 245 S.W. 1043 . Breach of contract does not, of itself, show fraud. Pool v. Joy, Tex.Civ.App., 61 S.W.2d 581 .””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.