In Re Keeling’s Empirical Analysis
2007
Citation profile
11 state decisions
Appellate journey
reviewedthe decision below (from Texas 82nd Judicial District Court)
Relationships
Relies on Daniels v. Williams · Logan v. Zimmerman Brush Co. · Armstrong v. Manzo · In Re Prudential Insurance Co. of America · Dubai Petroleum Co. v. Kazi
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) as payment in full for all orders for child support; (2) as payment in full for all orders for restitution; (3) as payment in full for all orders for reimbursement of the Texas Department of Human Services for financial assistance provided for the child’s health needs under Chapter 31, Human Resources Code, to a child of the inmate; (4) as payment in full for all orders for court fees and costs; (5) as payment in full for all orders for fines; and (6)as payment in full for any other court order, judgment, or writ.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.