Crowley v. Shultz’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
18 federal appellate · 1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 5 U.S.C. § 1101 (Civil Service Miscellaneous Amendments) · 5 U.S.C. § 5596 · 5 U.S.C. § 7701
Relies on Boeing Co. v. Van Gemert · Corporation v. Raymond International Inc · Payne v. Panama Canal Co. · Frazier v. Merit Systems Protection Board · 26 Fair Emplpraccas 1569 27 Empl Prac Dec P 32160
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 45 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“system, a personnel practice that has since been abolished. Under the overcomplement system, certain employees, while not terminated, were placed in what the appellees described in their complaint as”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crowley v. Shultz“The words 'timely appeal' refer to an appeal which is properly made to a Government agency or to the U.S. Civil Service Commission ....”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crowley v. Shultz“to cover an original action in the district court. In addition, the legislative history may plausibly be read to dispose of the issue.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Crowley v. Shultz
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.