Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Va. 289 - Rease v. Commonwealth

Rease v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis

1984

Citation profile

32
cited by 32 later decisions
6
states following
July 2018
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 32 later decisions — most recently July 2018 · most notably 51 Va. App. 443 - Price v. Commonwealth (2008), 39 Va. App. 314 - Alsberry v. Commonwealth (2002)

2 federal appellate · 30 state decisions

1601984199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (Antiterrorism and Effective Death Penalty Act of 1996)

Relies on Moody v. Daggett · Grant v. Commonwealth · Dyke v. Commonwealth · Richardson v. Commonwealth

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 32 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “When . . . the probationer commits another crime within the probation period and is arrested by another jurisdiction, thereby placing himself beyond the jurisdiction and control of the sentencing court, the one-year time constraint of § 19.2-306 is suspended. The time limit remains suspended, when the probation period expires during incarceration in the other jurisdiction, until the probationer is released by such other jurisdiction, provided the original court as soon as practicable has issued a warrant charging violation of probation and a detainer.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “Rehabilitation is more readily accomplished when the probationer is under the broad control of the court and the direct supervision of the court’s probation officer. And when defendant, due to his own conduct, is no longer under such control and supervision, the act of grace in granting probation in the first place is rendered a nullity.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.