227 Wis. 2d 316 - State v. Sprosty’s Empirical Analysis
1999
Citation profile
36 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 197 Wis. 2d 279 - State v. Post · 197 Wis. 2d 252 - State v. Carpenter · 82 Wis. 2d 565 - Karow v. Milwaukee County Civil Service Commission · 162 Wis. 2d 883 - State v. Martin · 215 Wis. 2d 459 - GMAC Mortgage Corp. v. Gisvold
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[further support... to a mandatory interpretation of 'shall.'”
4 later decisions quote this exact passage“[i]f the (court concludes that supervisory release is appropriate, it is then DHFS's statutory duty to 'arrange for control, care and treatment of the person in the least restrictive manner consistent with the requirements of the person and in accordance with the court's commitment order.'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“[accordingly, we hold that a circuit court has the authority under Wis. Stat. § 980.08 (5) to order a county, through DHFS, to create whatever programs or facilities are necessary to accommodate an order for supervised release.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.