Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 227 Wis. 2d 736 - State v. Kiernan

227 Wis. 2d 736 - State v. Kiernan’s Empirical Analysis

1999

Citation profile

31
cited by 31 later decisions
1
states following
August 2018
most recently cited

31 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 31 later decisions — most recently August 2018 · most notably 227 Wis. 2d 758 - State v. Erickson (1999), State v. Lindell (2001)

31 state decisions

150199920002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Irvin v. Dowd · Swain v. State of Alabama · Ross v. Oklahoma · Thompson v. City of Louisville · Dennis v. United States

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 31 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “conclusion of law premised on the belief that certain relationships are so inherently prone to partiality that an individual case-by-case inquiry is not worth the time or effort.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “We therefore give weight to the court's conclusion that a prospective juror is or is not objectively biased. We will reverse its conclusion only if as a matter of law a reasonable judge could not have reached such a conclusion.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent
  3. “inquires whether the record reflects that the juror is a reasonable person who is sincerely willing to set aside any opinion or prior knowledge that the juror might have.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the dissent

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.