227 W. Va. 285 - In Re Richard P.’s Empirical Analysis
2010
Citation profile
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 194 W. Va. 138 - Chrystal R.M. v. Charlie A.L. · 135 W. Va. 877 - State v. Epperly · 196 W. Va. 178 - Burgess v. Porterfield · 196 W. Va. 239 - Carter v. Carter · 208 W. Va. 325 - In Re Emily B.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The circuit court or family court of the county in which the minor resides, or if the minor is a nonresident of the state, the county in which the minor has an estate, may appoint as the minor’s guardian a suitable person. The father or mother shall receive priority. However, in every ease, the competency and fitness of the proposed guardian and the welfare and best interests of the minor shall be given precedence by the court when appointing the guardian.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage“'an instrument granting someone authority to act as agent or attorney-in-fact for the grantor.’ ” In re Richard P., 227 W.Va. 285 , 708 S.E.2d 479 (2010) (quoting Black’s Law Dictionary 1290 (9th ed. 2009)); Napier v. Compton, 210 W.Va. 594 , 558 S.E.2d 593 (W.Va.2001) (”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.