Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 Ariz. 24 - State v. Vega

State v. Vega’s Empirical Analysis

2011

Citation profile

8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
March 2017
most recently cited

8 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Bible · State v. Henderson · 15 Cal. 2d 731 - People v. Kynette · State v. Gulbrandson · State v. Roque

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a criminal case in which a defendant is charged with having committed a sexual offense, or a civil case in which a claim is predicated on a party’s alleged commission of a sexual offense, evidence of other crimes, wrongs, or acts may be admitted by the court if relevant to show that the defendant had a character trait giving rise to an aberrant sexual propensity to commit the offense charged. In such a case, evidence to rebut the proof of other crimes, wrongs, or acts, or an inference therefrom, may also be admitted. (1) In all such cases, the court shall admit evidence of the other act only if it first finds each of the following: (A) The evidence is sufficient to permit the trier of fact to find that the defendant committed the other act. (B) The commission of the other act provides a reasonable basis to infer that the defendant had a character trait giving rise to an aberrant sexual propensity to commit the crime charged. (C) The evidentiary value of proof of the other act is not substantially outweighed by danger of unfair prejudice, confusion of issues, or other factors mentioned in Rule 403.... (D) The court shall make specific findings with respect to each of (A), (B), and (C) of Rule 404(c)(1).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.