Lane v. Bell’s Empirical Analysis
2018
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 13 Cal. 3d 43 - Bertero v. National General Corp. · 47 Cal. 3d 863 - Sheldon Appel Co. v. Albert & Oliker · 46 Cal. 2d 375 - Albertson v. Raboff · 8 Cal. 4th 666 - Crowley v. Katleman · 32 Cal. 4th 336 - Casa Herrera, Inc. v. Beydoun
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[f]avorable termination 'is an essential element of the tort of malicious prosecution, and it is strictly enforced.'”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.