Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 CONN 758 - State v. Harrison

State v. Harrison’s Empirical Analysis

1994

Citation profile

60
cited by 60 later decisions
1
states following
March 2011
most recently cited

2 district · 58 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 60 later decisions — most recently March 2011 · most notably State v. Spears (1995), State v. Lipscomb (2001)

2 district · 58 state decisions

350199420002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Illinois v. Vitale · California Federal Savings & Loan Ass'n v. Guerra · State v. Fleming · In Re KH · State v. Dukes

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 60 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[w]e do not mechanistically apply penal code definitions to a statute but interpret the language in a manner that implements the statute's purpose.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “Arrest without warrant. Pursuit outside precincts. (a) For purposes of this section, the respective precinct or jurisdiction of a deputy sheriff . . . shall be wherever he is required to perform his duties. Peace officers . . . in their respective precincts, shall arrest without previous complaint and warrant, any person for any offense in their jurisdiction . . . .”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “(c) Members of any local police department . . . when in immediate pursuit of one who may be arrested under the provisions of this section, are authorized to pursue the offender outside of their respective precincts into any part of the state in order to effect the arrest.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.