Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 F.1d 819 - In re Haskell

In re Haskell’s Empirical Analysis

228 F. 819 · 1915

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
July 1941
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently July 1941

1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions

201915192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Shropshire, Woodliff & Co. v. Bush · Derby v. Worcester County · In re Roeber · In re J. M. Mertens & Co. · Packer v. Whittier

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.