Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

228 F.2d 222

Docket No. 99, Docket 23688.

Pannizzo v. Lauro

Second Circuit Court of Appeals

Submitted Nov. 7, 1955.

Decided Dec. 6, 1955.

Second Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-12-06

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently May 1961

6 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1292

Relies on Wills Lines

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-12-06

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Gray & Wythe, New York City (Horace M. Gray, New York City, of counsel), for garnishee-appellant.

¶2Arkin & Kottler, New York City (Edward Arkin, New York City, of counsel), for libellant-appellee.

¶3Before CLARK, Chief Judge, and LUMBARD and WATERMAN, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5The order of the district court here attempted to be brought before us allowed the case, with its clause for foreign attachment, to proceed, but settled no rights or liabilities of the parties. Hence it is not presently appealable. See Petition of Wills Lines, Inc., 2 Cir., 227 F.2d 509, and cases cited, interpreting 28 U.S.C. § 1292(3).

¶6Appeal dismissed.

/228/f2d/222 · .json · Public domain