In re Flasphaler

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals

Argued Nov. 29, 1955.

Decided Dec. 8, 1955.

District of Columbia Circuit Court of Appeals · decided 1955-12-08

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently March 1973

2 federal appellate ·

2 counsel of record

Relies on District of Columbia v. Pace · In re Jacobi

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by (per_curiam) · Decided 1955-12-08

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

¶1Mr. Homer Brooks, Washington, D. C., for petitioner.

¶2Mr. Paul A. Sweeney, Atty., Dept, of Justice, for respondent.

¶3Before-EDGERTON, Chief Judge, and PRETTYMAN, WILBUR K. MILLER, BAZELON, FAHY, WASHINGTON and DANAHER, Circuit Judges.

¶4PER CURIAM.

¶5We allowed this petition for a writ of mandamus to be filed so that we might consider the petitioner’s claim that it was the clear duty of the District Court to admit the petitioner to its bar. After hearing argument and being now fully advised, we find that mandamus does not lie. In re Jacobi, 94 U.S.App.D.C. 106, 217 F.2d 668.

¶6Petition denied.