Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

228 F.2d 912

No 11688

United States Court of Appeals Third Circuit.

Argued December 8, 1955.

Decided January 3, 1956.

Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently February 1975

1 district ·

Applies 21 U.S.C. § 343 (Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act)

Relies on 130 F. Supp. 715 - United States v. 20 Cases, More or Less

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Opinion by Per Curiam ·

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Delaware; Paul Leahy, Judge.

William Poole, Wilmington, Del. (Berl, Potter & Anderson, Wilmington, Del., Parker H. Jones, Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

Leonard D. Hardy, Sp. Asst. to U. S. Atty., Washington, D. C. (Warren Olney, III, Asst. Atty. Gen., Leonard G. Hagner, U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., Alvin L. Gottlieb, Attorney Department of Health, Education and Welfare, Washington, D. C., H. Newton White, Asst. U. S. Atty., Wilmington, Del., on the brief), for appellee.

Stephen E. Hamilton, Jr., Wilmington, Del. (H. Thomas Austern, Hamilton Carothers, Washington, D. C., of counsel), for National Macaroni Manufacturers Ass'n, amicus curiae.

Before McLAUGHLIN, KALODNER and HASTIE, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM.

¶1

In this libel for the misbranding of an article of food brought under 21 U.S. C.A. § 343(g) (1) the opinions of Chief Judge Leahy in the district court1 completely and correctly dispose of the case.

¶2

The judgment of the district court will be affirmed.

Notes:

1. 130 F.Supp. 715.

/228/f2d/912 · .json · Public domain