Jose Vasquez v. Wayne Strack, Superintendent, Fishkill Correctional Facility’s Empirical Analysis
228 F.3d 143 · 2000
Citation profile
22
cited by 22 later decisions
April 2007
most recently cited
12 federal appellate ·
Relationships
Relies on Williams v. Taylor · Teague v. Lane · Desist v. United States · MacKey v. United States · Wardius v. Oregon
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 22 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“An application for a writ of habeas corpus on behalf of a person in custody pursuant to the judgment of a State court shall not be granted with respect to any claim that was adjudicated on the merits in State court proceedings unless the adjudication of the claim (1) resulted in a decision that was contrary to, or involved an unreasonable application of, clearly established Federal law, as determined by the Supreme Court of the United States; or (2) resulted in a decision that was based on an unreasonable determination of the facts in light of the evidence presented in the State court proceeding.”
6 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. Lynn v. Bliden · Nowlin v. Greene
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.