McKinney v. Apfel’s Empirical Analysis
228 F.3d 860 · 2000
Citation profile
51 federal appellate · 7 district ·
Relationships
Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1381A (§ 1602 of the Social Security Act of 1935) · 42 U.S.C. § 416 (§ 216 of the Social Security Act of 1935)
Relies on Bowen v. Yuckert · Polaski v. Heckler · Woolf v. Shalala · Prosch v. Apfel
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 104 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“we consider evidence that detracts from the Commissioner's decision as well as evidence that supports it.”
14 later decisions quote this exact passage“based on all the evidence in the record, including `the medical records, observations of treating physicians and others, and an individual's own description of his limitations.'”
9 later decisions quote this exact passage“merely because substantial evidence also exists that would support a contrary outcome, or because we would have decided the case differently.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.