¶1 James P. Mayer appeals the district court’s order granting the Commissioner’s motion to dismiss Mayer’s action for disability insurance benefits and Supplemental Security Income payments. Mayer’s application was dismissed because a previous final decision concerning Mayer’s entitlement to benefits on the same facts and on the same issues had been entered. See 20 C.F.R. § 404.957(c) (2005). A district court has no jurisdiction to review the Commissioner’s res judicata decisions unless the claimant has raised a colorable claim of a constitutional violation. Califano v. Sanders, 430 U.S. 99, 97 S.Ct. 980, 51 L.Ed.2d 192 (1977). Mayer has raised no such claim. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm the district court’s order. See Mayer v. Barnhart, No. 7:06-cv-00054-FL (E.D.N.C. Nov. 15, 2006). We also deny Mayer’s motion for monthly benefit payments.
¶2 We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
¶3 AFFIRMED.