Bond v. Harris’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
1 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 1 (§ 1 of the Sherman Antitrust Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1331 · 29 U.S.C. § 158 (§ 8 of the National Labor Relations Act) · 29 U.S.C. § 186 (§ 302 of the Labor Management Relations Act of 1947 (Taft-Hartley Act)) · 29 U.S.C. § 52 (§ 20 of the Clayton Antitrust Act of 1914)
Relies on Southern Railway Co. v. North Carolina · Carroll v. American Federation of Musicians of United States & Canada · St. Luke's Hospital v. Secretary of Health & Human Services · Carroll v. Associated Musicians of Greater New York · Cutler v. American Federation of Musicians of United States & Canada
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““In this area, where courts must reconcile the sometimes conflicting policies of four acts of Congress, [Clayton, Norris-La Guardia, National Labor Relations Act, antitrust laws] two of which explicitly deprive a Federal court of ‘jurisdiction’ to issue an injunction, * * * there is special need for restraint in granting interlocutory relief.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.