Zemel v. Rusk’s Empirical Analysis
1964
Citation profile
1 district ·
Relationships
Applies 22 U.S.C. § 1732 · 22 U.S.C. § 211A (First Responders Passport Act) · 22 U.S.C. § 2656 (Cambodian Genocide Justice Act) · 28 U.S.C. § 1391 · 5 U.S.C. § 1009 · 8 U.S.C. § 1185 (§ 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952 (McCarran-Walter))
Relies on Gully v. First Nat. Bank in Meridian · Kennedy v. Mendoza-Martinez · Youngstown Sheet & Tube Co. v. Sawyer · Panama Refining Co. v. Ryan · Samuel Bailey v. Joe T. Patterson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 5 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““It is this Court’s finding that Congress has granted adequate authority to the Executive department to make these regulations, that their application in this Instance does not violate due process and the statutes which authorize the regulations, 22 U.S.C.A. § 211a and 8 U.S.C.A. § 1185 are valid and constitutional.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority““In this case the authority of the Secretary of State is founded on two specific acts of the Congress, namely, the Passport Act of 1926, 44 Stat. 887 , 22 U.S.C. § 211a and § 215 of the Immigration and Nationality Act of 1952, 66 Stat. 163 , 190, 8 U.S.C. § 1185 .””
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.