Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 F. Supp. 2d 1007 - Slusarchuk v. Hoff

228 F. Supp. 2d 1007 - Slusarchuk v. Hoff’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
October 2003
most recently cited

2 federal appellate ·

Relationships

Applies 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (Civil Rights Act of 1871 / Section 1983 (Ku Klux Klan Act))

Relies on Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc. · Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Daniels v. Williams · County of Sacramento v. Lewis · Duncan v. Walker

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[a] reasonable jury could conclude that the officers' initial decision to stop a law-abiding Rico Howard amounts to the type of conduct to which the Supreme Court referred when recognizing that a § 1983 action is redressible in situations where an officer intends to worsen a suspect's legal plight.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “that `shocks the conscience' or interferes with rights implicit in the concept of ordered liberty.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.