Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 F. Supp. 2d 1071 - Johnson v. Berry

228 F. Supp. 2d 1071 - Johnson v. Berry’s Empirical Analysis

2002

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
February 2021
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently February 2021

3 federal appellate · 3 district · 2 state decisions

70200220102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Applies 17 U.S.C. § 507 (§ 101 of the Copyright Act of 1976)

Relies on Board of Regents of Univ. of State of NY v. Tomanio · Order of Railroad Telegraphers v. Railway Express Agency, Inc. · Chase Securities Corp. v. Donaldson · Stone v. Williams · Kregos v. Associated Press

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[b]y failing to plead in response to the first amended complaint, and therein to replead his counterclaim, [the defendant] abandoned his counterclaim, which effectively dropped from the case.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “[n]o civil action shall be maintained under the provisions of this title unless it is commenced within three years after the claim accrued.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “imminent and all claims of the first amended complaint [had been] subject to summary judgment[.]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.