Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 228 ILL 610 - Diederich v. Rose

Diederich v. Rose’s Empirical Analysis

1907

Citation profile

16
cited by 16 later decisions
2
states following
December 1980
most recently cited

16 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 16 later decisions — most recently December 1980

16 state decisions

40190719101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Williams v. Vanderbilt · St. Louis & Cairo Railroad v. Postal Telegraph Co. · Furey v. . Town of Gravesend · Traynor v. Palmer · Gardner v. Watson

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 16 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““When the language is clear and admits of but one meaning there is no room for construction. Courts cannot change the clear meaning of words used, even though the consequences appear not to be such as were contemplated.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.