Stice v. State’s Empirical Analysis
1950
Citation profile
69 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 69 later decisions — most recently January 1981 · most notably Baker v. State (1956), McAfee v. State (1973)
69 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Wilson v. State · Hawkins v. State · Christen v. State · Landreth v. State · Henry v. State
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 69 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““This court cannot weigh evidence, but must determine whether there is substantial ¿viderice of probative value from which a jury could reasonably have inferred that appellant was guilty of the crime. . . .” Stice v. State (1950), 228 Ind. 144, 149 , 89 N. E. 2d 915 . “. • • We use the word ‘substantial’ as meaning more than ‘seeming or imaginary.’ . . .” Sylvester v. State (1933), 205 Ind. 628, 632 , 187 N. E. 669 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Meadows v. State
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.